StATS: Review of statistical methods in The New England Journal of Medicine and Nature Medicine (March 5, 2007)
The Kansas University Medical Center has a statistics journal club and this month, they reviewed an article
- Strasak AM, Zaman Q, Marinelli G, Pfeiffer KP, and Ulmer H (2007) The Use of Statistics in Medical Research: A Comparison of The New England Journal of Medicine and Nature Medicine. The American Statistician, 61(1): 47-55.
This article reviewed all
There was a lively discussion that was difficult to summarize. There is a general consensus that the research problems identified by this article are also true in our personal experience. The problems with research in the basic sciences are probably due to the fact that many basic researchers have been used to doing their statistics on their own and they need to consult more often with statisticians.
If someone comes to you are and presents an approach that you know is flawed, you don't have to acquiesce just because other people have done it this way and got it published. Just show them this article and point out that
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. It was written by Steve Simon.
This page was written by Steve Simon while working at Children's Mercy Hospital. Although I do not hold the copyright for this material, I am reproducing it here as a service, as it is no longer available on the Children's Mercy Hospital website. Need more information? I have a page with general help resources. You can also browse for pages similar to this one at